Deposited $2.7M. Lost $2.4M. Still trading. bcda is a whale who swung hard and missed harder. Rank 2,159,959 with -$2.39M total PnL across 841 trades, this account reads like a case study in conviction without edge. The 44.6% win rate sits below break-even, and the -89.41% ROI on deposits tells you everything: nearly nine dollars lost for every ten put in. The strategy was volume. 837 markets touched, 61 trades per day on average, $59.8M in total volume. Low risk classification masks the real problem — it wasn't risk management, it was risk blindness. Best trade pulled $285K on Utah Valley Wolverines vs. Southern Utah Thunderbirds. Worst trade dumped $237K on Clippers vs. Pistons (2026-01-11). Both swing single trades — not a system, a dice roll. What separated bcda from successful volume players: buy-sell ratio of 32:1 shows aggressive directional betting instead of balanced market-making. The math doesn't work when you're wrong 55% of the time and betting that hard one way. Deposited $2.7M, withdrew only $66K. Portfolio now sits at $228K with 51 open positions still bleeding. Currently underwater on conviction. The account stopped being a trading edge somewhere around trade 400 and became a monument to capital. Still holding 51 open bets suggests either stubborn averaging down or positions forgotten entirely. At this pace, the remaining $228K gets interesting only if they can flip the win rate — and nothing in the data says that's happening.